Corona viruses exist but COVID 19 does not exist beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt

Corona viruses exist but COVID 19 does not exist beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt

COVID-19 (previously known as “2019 novel coronavirus”)

http://web.archive.org/web/20200224144153/who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it

"COVID-19 is a respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, a new coronavirus discovered in 2019"

http://web.archive.org/web/20200623090859/cdc.gov/dotw/covid-19/index.html

You can remember what COVID 19 means by the acronym Corona Virus IDentified 2019.  The word novel means new.  All COVID 19 viruses are corona viruses but not all corona viruses are COVID 19 viruses.  A corona virus can only be a COVID 19 virus if it was newly discovered in 2019 therefore if someone gets a corona virus of a type that was discovered before 2019 they did not get COVID 19.  

If it is determined that someone got a corona virus but it is not determined if the strain of corona virus they got was newly discovered in 2019 then that case of Corona virus can not be confirmed to be a case of someone catching COVID 19, they might have COVID 19 but unless there is evidence that the specific strain they got was the type discovered in 2019 then there is no evidence that they got COVID 19 only that they got a corona virus which might or might not be COVID 19.  On the other hand if someone is determined to have a corona virus that was discovered before 2019 then it can be determined that the virus that was sampled from them was not COVID 19 and in that case there is also no evidence that that person got COVID 19.

There must be at least one sample of a COVID 19 virus found in order for there to be evidence that even one human or animal had COVID 19 because someone having Corona virus is only evidence that at least one person has COVID 19 if the type of corona virus they had has been proven to be the same strain as COVID 19.  If no samples of the specific strain COVID 19 have been found anywhere in the world then no evidence has been presented that anyone has ever got COVID 19.  If there is no evidence that anyone had ever gotten COVID 19 or more simply if a sample of COVID 19 has never been found then COVID 19 was never discovered.  Since COVID 19 by definition was discovered in 2019 then if no sample of the COVID 19 strain of corona virus was discovered in 2019 then COVID 19 does not exist.  If a new strain of corona virus is discovered after the year 2019 such as any year 2020 or later but no sample of the COVID 19 strain was discovered in the year 2019 then COVID 19 still does not exist because by definition COVID 19 refers to a specific strain discovered in 2019.

A CDC document released by the FDA confirms that no sample of COVID 19 was used in a testing procedure they published because no samples were available when a test to determine if a human has COVID 19 was designed.  This proves beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt that the center of disease control has committed fraud if they report that more than zero humans have received COVID 19 based on that test in their own literature.  Furthermore if they claim to have acquired a sample at a later date they still would have committed fraud if they reported more than zero cases of COVID 19  based on tests prior to receiving that sample because they still could not have used a sample of COVID 19 to perform the tests they did prior to acquiring a sample of COVID 19.

"Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen."

Page 40

http://web.archive.org/web/20210901224937/fda.gov/media/134922/download

There is less than a reasonable shadow of a doubt that COVID 19 exists.  Maybe samples of COVID 19 were discovered somewhere in the world but such samples were not available at the time the testing procedure in the link above was published.  Did such samples exist in the year 2019 and were samples taken in the year 2019 kept in unmodified form available at the present date?  If samples were never found in 2019 then COVID 19 does not exist.  Unless samples of COVID 19 taken in the year 2019 are presented as evidence to confirm the existence of COVID 19 it is unreasonable to assume the existence of COVID 19.  Confirming something was never found normally does not disprove it's existence but in this case it does because one of it's properties by definition is having been found (discovered) in 2019.

Burden of proof is required for it to be reasonable to believe a claim is true, but burden of proof is also required for it to be reasonable to believe a claim is false.  If someone insists there are tigers in a specific very small public park in North America (where tigers are not native) but claims multitudes of people at a time have searched it 24 hours a day every day for over a year and are still searching for it right now and have never found evidence of tigers being there then it is unreasonable for them to insist you assume tigers are currently there at that specific location because in such a case they have presented eye witness testimony that tigers are not currently in that park and have not been there since they started searching.  In such a case if they are not lying they have met the burden of proof that tigers are not and were not there during that time period but they have failed to meet the burden of proof that tigers are there or were there during that time period.  CDC said no samples were available in that publication but also insists you believe COVID 19 is so widespread in the neighborhood they live in there is a COVID 19 pandemic in that neighborhood.  The United States CDC if truthful in their publication has met the burden of proof that COVID 19 was not found and did not exist within their neighborhood of the United States by testifying no samples were available in their own neighborhood but have failed to meet the burden of proof that COVID 19 was found in the neighborhood of the United States.

What if they got data about COVID 19 from China where it was originally found and used it to perform the test instead of using a sample of COVID 19 found in the United States for comparison purposes when testing humans for the presence of COVID 19?  If they did that they could have found a sample of COVID 19 in the United States that matches the alleged data from China from at least one of the people they tested in the United States and would not be in a situation where no sample of COVID 19 was found and isolated anywhere in the United States to be used to test people in the future for COVID 19.  Why is it reasonable to believe none was found anywhere in the United States?  If there was a sample found anywhere in the United States the designers of the test could have either traveled to the location the sample was stored or shipped the sample to themselves but it should not require distant travel or out of State shipping because if the pandemic is as massive as they claim they could get samples of COVID 19 from infected people in their own city and isolate it.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2021 October 24

Permission is granted to duplicate this article with requirements of attribution and providing the link to the original source below and the additional requirement of copying the article in entirety without removing any sections.  Permission is not granted to copy portions of the article without presenting the entire article nor to edit the article unless it is explicitly stated that it is not the original article and is edited and may no longer represent the views presented in the original

web.archive.org/web/*/covidcontraindications.blogspot.com/2021/10/corona-viruses-exist-covid-19-does-not.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blood Clotting and COVID 19 Vaccine

After conducting an updated analysis, evaluation and investigation of reported cases, the FDA has determined that the risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a syndrome of rare and potentially life-threatening blood clots in combination with low levels of blood platelets with onset of symptoms approximately one to two weeks following administration of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine, warrants limiting the authorized use of the vaccine. https://web.archive.org/web/20220505210145/https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-limits-use-janssen-covid-19-vaccine-certain-individuals In May 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limited the authorized use of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J;) COVID-19 vaccine due to reports of a blood-clotting disorder https://web.archive.org/web/20221002141653/https://www.healthline.com/health/covid-vaccine-pulmonary-embolism
Read more

COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk

 "risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure. " http://web.archive.org/web/20211121050918/researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk October 2021 Spiro Pantazatos Herve Seligmann http://web.archive.org/web/20220307083323/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Spiro-Pantazatos/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk/links/6212dae26c472329dcfa0152/COVID-vaccination-and-age-stratified-all-cause-mortality-risk.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Spiro-Pantazatos/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk/links/6212dae26c472329dcfa0152/COVID-vaccination-and-age-stratified-all-cause-mortality-risk.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/project/Risk-benefit-analyses-o...
Read more

Archbishop letter about Covid 19 to President Donald Trump

Carlo Maria Viganò Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America  The investigations already under way will reveal the true responsibility of those who managed the Covid emergency not only in the area of health care but also in politics, the economy, and the media. We will probably find that in this colossal operation of social engineering there are people who have decided the fate of humanity, arrogating to themselves the right to act against the will of citizens and their representatives in the governments of nations. We will also discover that the riots in these days were provoked by those who, seeing that the virus is inevitably fading and that the social alarm of the pandemic is waning, necessarily have had to provoke civil disturbances, because they would be followed by repression which, although legitimate, could be condemned as an unjustified aggression against the population. The same thing is also happening in Europe, in perfect syn...
Read more